Why Marriage Matters for Same-Sex Parental Protections in Ohio. Analysis of Ohio Supreme Court Decision in In Re: L.E.S.

Ohio same-sex parental rights artificial insemination

Ohio Same-Sex Parental Rights Artificial Insemination Under Ohio Law

The Ohio Supreme Court issued a significant ruling on April 28, 2026, clarifying how parental rights are established for same-sex couples using artificial insemination. The Ohio Supreme Court recently clarified issues surrounding Ohio same-sex parental rights artificial insemination in a significant decision involving unmarried same-sex parents and the application of Ohio’s parentage statutes. Click here to read the full decision, which highlights a critical takeaway for LGBTQ+ families in the state: legal marriage remains the primary gateway to securing automatic parental protections under Ohio’s artificial insemination statutes.

The Case: C.E. v. P.S.

The ruling stems from a custody dispute between two women, identified as C.E. and P.S., who were in a long-term relationship before the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. During their relationship, P.S. (the biological mother) gave birth to children conceived through artificial insemination.… View Full Article → “Why Marriage Matters for Same-Sex Parental Protections in Ohio. Analysis of Ohio Supreme Court Decision in In Re: L.E.S.”

The Ohio Supreme Court Just Clarified the Standard for Terminating a Share Parenting Plan [LEGAL ALERT]

Alert! Key Legal Update

LEGAL ALERT: Who gets Legal Custody of a Minor Child After Termination of a Shared Parenting Plan? The Ohio Supreme Court Intervenes

Last week, the Ohio Supreme Court was asked to resolve a conflict between Ohio appeals courts. The difficult question that the Ohio Supreme Court was faced with in Bruns v. Green was whether there must be a change in circumstance in order to designate a parent the residential parent and legal custodian of a minor child after terminating a share-parenting decree.

The Ohio Supreme Court ultimately concluded that a trial court only needs to consider the best interest of the child when deciding whether to terminate a shared parenting plan and which parent to designate as the residential and custodial parent of a minor child.

Facts of Bruns v. Green – Ohio Supreme Court

Marcus Green (“Father”) and Kayleigh Bruns (“Mother”) are the biological parents of one minor child born in 2012.… View Full Article → “The Ohio Supreme Court Just Clarified the Standard for Terminating a Share Parenting Plan [LEGAL ALERT]”